Someone spot this guy???

yeah he's under the barbell

I feel like this picture really gives it context

you know how it is with spaghetti

?????

IT'S THEM

you have managed to condense three new post ideas into just one post

I once saw a registered nurse position listed by Denny’s

Hey just as a heads up, the company who did this monitoring, Antenna, has ONLY been monitoring Netflix for four years, which means they’re not including any data from the start of, or the peak of Netflix. (Plus this data is a blog post, not an actual research article.)

Additionally, the article that it looks like every single one of the posts is referencing is only drawing attention to four days in May, most notably being May 26 and 27. Realistically, it’s only a couple hundred thousand new subscribers, which frankly pales in comparison to the millions of subscribers that Netflix currently has and currently stands to lose.

Plus, the article ends with a plug for Antenna’s services.

https://www.antenna.live/post/a-first-look-at-the-impact-of-netflixs-password-sharing-crackdown

I’m not a professional or anything, but here’s the link to the actual blog post if anyone wants to take a look. I think media outlets are being intentionally misleading about the scope of this to try and make it look like Netflix succeeded, but I haven’t seen anyone in the tags talk about this.

That still is a lot and then it’s this misinformation that’s going to get other companies to think they should do it too. Again what happened to helping show runners and the WGA out?

I looked at different fact checking sites to evaluate this journal and there is nothing on it.

The only way to access this website is by typing in “Antenna Methodology” otherwise typing in “antenna” or “antenna journalism” will only talk about physical antennas.

It’s sketchy that you can’t look it up easily as I had to go to the link provided by the user above and click the link at the end to figure out to type in “Antenna Methodology”. Even when you type in “Antenna Methodology” or “Antenna.live” these websites give nothing.

Everything gives you an irrelevant result (which is the most common result) or a “no results found” message (as seen below):

What’s even sketchier is the fact that they want you to pay for the data they have instead of releasing it to the public (this is much different than the no fly list that got leaked because these statistics shouldn’t contain people’s personal information).

It made a bit more sense when I went to the writer for this article’s (Brendan Brady) LinkedIn and saw he posted this:

A startup is “a company that's in the initial stages of business.” This is why I could not find any information on it.

As for the people who Tweeted this (PopBase), they aren’t really professional. This was their response to someone mimicking them:

ALT

ALT

Calling a mimicker “attention-deprived” and getting mad at 10k people for being deceived by a copycat isn’t quite professional. Think: would a professional news outlet (MSNBC, CNN, BBC) respond like this?

This feels more like a tabloid. Buzzfeed feels more professional than them.

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeed

https://twitter.com/PopBase

In conclusion, this Tweet was made by a tabloid-like account who is less professional than Buzzfeed featuring undisclosed “statistics and research” you need to pay for to see and incomplete information from a startup company trying to promote themselves at the end of their article.

As @hawthornvisual put it:

Please stay safe out there and use media literacy to prevent misinformation like this from spreading and getting out of control! Stay safe, everyone 🩵